The Bench Report

Terminal Illness Mental Health Support: Ending the Postcode Lottery in Palliative Care

• The Bench Report • Season 5 • Episode 14

Share episode

 This episode explores the crucial gap in mental health support for individuals with terminal illnesses, drawing from a parliamentary debate sparked by the experience of Mike and his late wife, Sarah. Sarah suffered deep depression and anxiety but received inadequate care, facing long waiting lists and inappropriate therapies. The discussion emphasizes that mental suffering is as crushing as physical symptoms, yet the current system is a "postcode lottery" where access to specialist psychological support, like that provided by psycho-oncologists, depends on geography and hospice funding. Members of Parliament urged for immediate baseline mental health assessments upon diagnosis and sustainable funding for specialized palliative care.

Key Takeaways

  • Mental health struggles, including severe depression and anxiety, are common consequences of terminal illnesses but are often overlooked in a health culture that prioritizes physical symptoms.
  • Existing mental health services offered to the terminally ill, such as counselling or cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), often fail due to lengthy waiting lists or because the therapy is not specialized or appropriate for their needs.
  • Specialist psychological care is required for cancer patients, but psycho-oncologists are often badly overstretched.
  • Access to quality emotional and mental support at the end of life is inconsistent and depends on the resources and fundraising success of local hospices, creating significant inequality.
  • Mental health support must adopt a whole-person approach, ensuring that the patient's family and unpaid carers also receive necessary support and bereavement services.
  • Policy recommendations include conducting immediate baseline mental health assessments upon terminal diagnosis and creating a clear referral pathway to experienced psycho-oncologists.

Source: Terminal Illness: Mental Health Support
Volume 776: debated on Wednesday 3 December 2025

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com

Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0...

Ivan:

Hello and welcome once more to the Bench Report, where we discuss recent debates from the benches of the UK Parliament. A new topic every episode. You're listening to Amy and Ivan. So this week we're looking at a really uh a crucial debate that was sparked by a heartbreaking story from a constituent.

Amy:

It's about the mental health crisis facing people with terminal illnesses.

Ivan:

Exactly. The catalyst was a man named Mike who shared the story of his late wife, Sarah. She was diagnosed with lung cancer back in 2017.

Amy:

And what Mike described was, well, it was a profound decline, not just from the cancer itself, but from a complete lack of psychological support.

Ivan:

He said this vibrant, outgoing woman became, in his words, a shell of her former self, crying daily, unable to even read or eat. It really paints a picture of this mental health trap door that opens with a diagnosis.

Amy:

And Sarah's story, sadly, isn't an isolated one. The numbers brought up in Parliament show that what Mike experienced is happening across the country.

SPEAKER_01:

What are those numbers?

Amy:

Well, officially, 17% of cancer patients are diagnosed with depression or anxiety. But the shocking part is that nearly half of them will never get the treatment they actually need.

Ivan:

And the debate highlighted the reasons why, didn't it? It seems to be a twofold problem.

Amy:

It is. First, you have the waiting lists. They can run into months, which is just an impossible time frame when you're terminally ill.

Ivan:

And second, even when support is offered, it can be completely inappropriate.

Amy:

Massively. I mean, Sarah was told to read a leaflet or to try gardening.

Ivan:

Despite being too physically unwell to do either, it just illustrates this huge disconnect, this failure at the clinical level.

Amy:

It points to a very specific gap. What's needed is a psycho oncologist, a specialist who understands the mental health toll of a cancer diagnosis.

Ivan:

And Sarah's local hospital did have one, but they were completely overstretched.

Amy:

Which just reinforces the point. You can't have one specialist covering thousands of patients. It's not a workable system.

Ivan:

So this all widens out then from an individual clinical failure to a much bigger systemic one. It's about how we fund end-of-life care.

Amy:

It is. The phrase that kept coming up was postcode lottery.

Ivan:

Meaning your access to support depends entirely on the financial health of your local hospice, not your clinical need.

Amy:

Precisely. We heard some alarming evidence on this. Hospices like Weldmar are facing deficits of nearly a million pounds.

Ivan:

And forgive me, not hospice had to cut 800 treatment spaces.

Amy:

Which has a disproportionate impact on poorer communities. The funding shortfall hits them the hardest.

Ivan:

So what did Mike and the other MPs propose as a solution? What has to change?

Amy:

They laid out some very clear steps. First, an immediate mental health assessment the moment a terminal diagnosis is given, a baseline.

Ivan:

Okay, that makes sense.

Amy:

Then a clear, properly funded pathway to a psycho oncologist. And finally, and this is the big one, a sustainable long-term funding model for hospices to end that post-code lottery for good.

Ivan:

And what was the government's response to this?

Amy:

The minister spoke about a commitment to move more care into the community. There's also a new palliative and end-of-life care framework due this spring.

SPEAKER_01:

They also mentioned new investment, didn't they?

Amy:

They did. An extra six hundred and eighty-eight million in cash terms for mental health and the recruitment of almost 7,000 new mental health workers since mid-2024.

Ivan:

But I suppose the question is whether general mental health recruitment solves a crisis of specialist access. If hospice is still cutting services, it doesn't matter if care is in the community because the services aren't there.

Amy:

That's the core of it. And you also have to remember the family. It's not just the patient who goes through this.

Ivan:

No, the whole family unit is on that journey.

Amy:

Exactly. Unpaid carers, loved ones, they suffer an immense emotional toll. There was talk of a potential 204-7 palliative care helpline, which would be a vital support for them.

Ivan:

And what really puts the urgency of all this into sharp focus for me is a statistic we heard.

Amy:

That over 10% of all UK suicides are linked to chronic or terminal physical illnesses.

Ivan:

10%. When you hear that, you realize this isn't an optional extra.

Amy:

Not at all. It underscores why the psychological care must be built into palliative care from day one. It can't be an add on or a reaction to a crisis. It's the only way to really honor the lives of people like Sarah.

Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.

Parliament Matters Artwork

Parliament Matters

Hansard Society