The Bench Report

Tackling the NEET Crisis: Structural Barriers and New Pathways for Young People

β€’ The Bench Report β€’ Season 5 β€’ Episode 9

There is a rising number of young people aged 16–24 who are Not in Education, Employment, or Training (NEETs). We discuss how structural barriers, such as limiting disabilities, low qualifications, mental health challenges, and fragmented career support, often contribute to this crisis, countering the narrative that young people are simply unmotivated. Key themes include the urgent need for accessible academic, vocational, and technical pathways, and the government's plans, including the Youth Jobs Guarantee and reforms to the careers service, aimed at providing holistic and sustained support to help this generation succeed.

Key Takeaways

  • The proportion of young people identified as NEETs has been rising since 2021 and is nearing its highest level since 2014.
  • Barriers preventing young people from working or learning are often structural, stemming from issues like limiting disability, mental health conditions, or having low qualifications, rather than a personal lack of motivation.
  • There is a recognized need to shift focus away from a strong emphasis on university towards clear, respected vocational and technical training routes to meet the nation's demand for skilled trades like plumbing and bricklaying.
  • New government measures include merging jobcentres with the National Careers Service to offer personalized coaching and digital tools.
  • Targeted and preventive support, including early intervention for mental health and investment in youth hubs, is vital.
  • Financial disincentives, such as the housing benefit taper rate which penalizes young people in supported accommodation for increasing their earnings, must be addressed.

Definitions 

  • NEETs: An acronym for young people not in education, employment or training, typically referring to those aged 16 to 24.

Source: Young People not in Education, Employment or Training
Volume 776: debated on Wednesday 26 November 2025


Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes daily: thebenchreport.co.uk

Subscribe to our Substack

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com

Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok! @benchreportUK

Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0...

Amy:

Hello and welcome once more to the Bench Report, where we discuss recent debates from the benches of the UK Parliament. A new topic every episode. You're listening to Amy and Ivan. Today we're looking at a recent Westminster Hall discussion focused on supporting young people who are not in education, employment, or training, often just called NEETs.

Ivan:

And the numbers are um quite concerning.

Amy:

They are. We heard that the proportion of 16 to 24 year olds in this group has been climbing since 2021.

Ivan:

And it's now nearing its highest point since 2014. But what the debate made very clear right from the start is that this isn't about lazy young people.

Amy:

Well, MPs really push back on that.

Ivan:

They argued that view is short-sighted, and you know, it com completely ignores a much more complex reality.

Amy:

A reality that we see in stories like that of Sean Holland. He's 22 and he's desperate to work.

Ivan:

But he has arthritis and severe foot problems.

Amy:

And the only work he could find was this really unpredictable agency work. And his employers, they refused to make even the simplest adjustments.

Ivan:

Things like providing a chair so we could do packaging work. It's a basic accommodation.

Amy:

It is. And Colin from Derbyshire Unemployed Worker Centers made a really powerful comparison.

Ivan:

He did. He likened this modern agency work to the old buddy man system for coal miners.

Amy:

Which was essentially an unsustainable cash-in-hand recruitment model.

Ivan:

Exactly. It's a system that denies people any kind of predictability or really their basic rights.

Amy:

And the data presented really shows who is most vulnerable here.

Ivan:

The risk factors are quite specific. First, not having an academic qualification above level one.

Amy:

So that's below what you'd consider a good GCSC.

Ivan:

Precisely. Then you have having a limiting disability, living with a mental health condition, or having special educational needs. These issues just compound.

Amy:

And they compound dramatically. A young person with low qualifications from a disadvantaged background is what, 130% more likely to become neat?

Ivan:

A staggering number. And for young people with SENS special educational needs and disabilities, they're over 80% more likely to be neat than their peers. The system is clearly failing them.

Amy:

So why is the system letting this happen? One MP used a very striking image.

Ivan:

The Q, yes.

Amy:

He said for those going to university, there's a clear cue. But for those who aren't academic, there is, and I'm quoting, no cue.

Ivan:

They're treated like free-range chickens. Yeah. Just left to wander without a clear career track.

Amy:

And considering around 65% of school leavers don't go to university, that's a massive gap in support.

Ivan:

It's huge, but there are some, you know, welcome steps being proposed to address this.

Amy:

Like merging job centers with the National Career Service.

Ivan:

Yes, to create a single point of contact for personalized coaching. The idea is to stop people being bounced between different services.

Amy:

And there's also a growing call to properly elevate technical and vocational education, moving away from that old 50% university target.

Ivan:

Absolutely. And we're seeing good examples of this, like Derby College Group being designated a construction technical excellence college. That kind of industry partnership is key.

Amy:

But the action needs to be holistic and it needs to be urgent, especially for that high-risk send cohort.

Ivan:

And at the end of the day, the ultimate goal has to be prevention.

Amy:

So stopping young people from falling into this trap in the first place.

Ivan:

Exactly. The debate cited the David Dnieper Academy. It works very closely with local industry, and it's achieved zero NEETs aged 18 for the last two academic years.

Amy:

Zero. That's incredible.

Ivan:

It proves that when you create clear, accessible pathways from school into work, the problem can be solved.

Amy:

So that leaves us with a question for you to think about. Given the government's stated intention to move away from prioritizing university, what specific measurable steps should every secondary school take in the next year to genuinely elevate technical and trade skills to the same level of respect as A levels? As always, find us on social media at benchreport UK. Get in touch with any topic important to you. Remember, politics is everyone's business. Take care.

Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.