The Bench Report
🇬🇧 Making UK politics accessible & accountable.
✂️ Concise summaries of debates & briefings.
⚡️ A new topic every episode.
Discover the issues your MP's are talking about. Local, national or international affairs, from AI regulation to climate finance to bin collection in Birmingham...we give you the crucial context you need.
Listener suggestions are vital to our mission - making politics more accessible and accountable. So please get in touch and producer Tom (me) will grab another coffee and start scanning those pages of Hansard.
- Stay Informed: Get up-to-date on the latest parliamentary debates and policy decisions, many of which can be overshadowed by the headlines.
- Accessible Politics: We break down complex political jargon into clear, understandable audio summaries.
- Accountability: Understand how your government is working and hold them accountable.
- Targeted Content: Search our episode library for topics that matter to you, personally or professionally.
Our Sources:
- No outside chatter. We rely only on the official record of Parliamentary debates: Hansard.parliament.uk
- Reports from Parliamentary Committees that consider and scrutise government work: committees.parliament.uk
- Upcoming Parliamentary bills: bills.parliament.uk
- The comprehensive resources of the House of Commons Library: commonslibrary.parliament.uk
Legal:
- Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0. parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament
Email:
- thebenchreportuk@gmail.com
Substack
Subscribe to our blog for in-depth analysis of debates, past and present.
thebenchreport.substack.com
Extended episodes:
We try to keep episodes short and concise, but if you would like a more detailed analysis of a particular topic, please get in touch!
About Me:
I'm Tom, producer of 'The Bench Report'. Yorkshireman, ex-primary school teacher, now working in the world of education technology. Dad of two, elite village cricketer, knackered footballer. Fascinated by UK and US politics and the world my kids will be taking over.
The Bench Report
Baby Allergy Guidance Review: Preventing Allergies in Infants
A proposed Bill seeks to review allergy guidance for feeding and weaning babies in the UK. Spearheaded by Becky Gittins, an allergy sufferer herself, the Bill addresses the increasing rates of allergic diseases in the UK. It highlights that current NHS guidance on introducing allergy-triggering foods, such as peanuts and eggs, may be outdated compared to international approaches. The focus is on prevention for high-risk infants (those with severe eczema or existing egg allergies), aiming to provide clearer, more consistent advice to parents and healthcare professionals to reduce the burden of allergies.
Key Takeaways:
- The UK has some of the highest rates of allergic conditions globally, affecting over a quarter of the population and costing the NHS over £1 billion annually.
- Current NHS guidance on introducing potential allergens (like peanuts and eggs) is based on a report nearly 10 years old.
- International evidence, including the LEAP study and guidelines from the US and Europe, suggests early introduction of these allergens (between four and six months) for high-risk infants can prevent allergy development.
- The Bill specifically targets children showing early signs of allergy and does not contradict general breastfeeding advice.
- A review aims to improve clarity, increase awareness, empower healthcare professionals, and ensure ethnic minorities are not disadvantaged, as they are often more predisposed to allergies.
Definitions
- Allergic Disease: Common chronic conditions like asthma, hay fever, and food allergies, which are increasing in prevalence and impact daily life.
- Early Introduction of Allergens: Deliberately introducing potential allergy-triggering foods (e.g., peanuts, eggs) to high-risk infants between four and six months of age to reduce the risk of developing allergies, as supported by studies like LEAP.
Source: Babies and Infants (Allergy Guidance)
Volume 772: debated on Tuesday 2 September 2025
Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes Mon-Thurs: thebenchreport.co.uk
Subscribe to our Substack for in depth analysis of debates past and present.
Shape our next episode or article! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!
Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com
Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook and Instagram @BenchReportUK
Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.
No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.
Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....
Thank you.
Amy:Hello and welcome again to The Bench Report, concise summaries of debates and briefings from the benches of the UK Parliament, a new topic every episode. It's September 2025, summer recess is over, and we are back in session. You're listening to Amy and Ivan. Today we're examining a new bill in Parliament focusing on a critical public health issue, allergy guidance for babies and infants. This is a topic that truly resonates with many families, and you might find some of insights from this parliamentary discussion quite surprising.
Ivan:It is compelling, isn't it? How one MP's personal journey is shedding light on such a significant public health challenge. Our look into the material today will reveal the sheer scale of the issue and the, well, the proactive changes being proposed, highlighting the real world impact of current medical advice and the potential for a fresh approach.
Amy:So let's unpack that. How does a personal story turn into a national policy debate? It starts with MP Becky Gettins from Clued East. She mentioned she's a long time allergy sufferer herself and expecting her first child, she's been actively looking into prevention. And she's highlighting a serious problem. The UK grapples with some of the highest rates of allergic conditions globally. It affects more than a quarter of the population.
Ivan:That's right. And those numbers, they aren't just abstract figures. They represent a significant burden. Allergic conditions are now among the most common chronic diseases for children. Think about this. 6% of all GP visits are allergy related.
Amy:Six percent. Wow.
Ivan:And the medicines needed. They consume 10 percent of the entire GP prescribing budget. The direct cost to the NHS for managing these diseases is over a billion pounds annually. And frankly, that's likely an understatement.
Amy:A billion pounds.
Ivan:More intimately, you'll find on average two children in every single classroom affected by food allergies. That number actually doubled in the UK just between 2008 and 2018. The growth is, well, it's exponential.
Amy:With figures like that, it certainly suggests current approaches aren't quite cutting it. So what's the radical shift this bill is actually proposing for parents, especially those, you know, with high risk babies?
Ivan:The central idea is a pivot, a pivot towards prevention. The bill argues for a review of the existing food allergy guidance for feeding and weaning babies, but specifically for a high risk group.
Amy:High risk meaning?
Ivan:Infants already showing early signs like severe eczema or those who already have a diagnosed egg allergy. The argument is Preventing these severe conditions from developing is better for patients and, crucially, for the NHS's financial sustainability.
Amy:Makes sense.
Ivan:And it's important to clarify, this proposal doesn't contradict advice for exclusive breastfeeding for about six months. Not at all. Any potential early weaning for this specific group would still happen alongside continued breastfeeding.
Amy:Okay, so if we circle back to those alarming statistics, what's the main issue with our current advice? And how does it stack up globally?
Ivan:Well, the current NHS guidance on introducing potential allergens It's almost a decade old.
Amy:A decade. In medical terms, that's quite a while.
Ivan:It is. And it suggests that delaying the introduction of foods like peanuts and eggs beyond 6 to 12 months might actually increase the risk of developing an allergy. But here's the thing. Many other countries have moved in a completely different direction now.
Amy:Such as?
Ivan:The U.S., parts of Europe. They actively encourage the early introduction of allergens, usually between 4 and 6 months, again specifically for for these high-risk infants? There was a groundbreaking study, the LAB study Learning Early About Peanuts, published 10 years ago now.
Amy:Ah, yes. I remember hearing about that.
Ivan:It showed that among high-risk infants aged 4 to 11 months, 17% who avoided peanuts developed an allergy by age 5, 17%, compared to just 3% among those who regularly ate peanut snacks from an early age.
Amy:17 versus 3. That's a huge difference. Really stark.
Ivan:It's massive. And as a result, U.S. guidance now recommends introducing So it sounds like there's a real
Amy:disconnect then. Why isn't this information getting through effectively here?
Ivan:That seems to be the crux of it. Many young parents and parents-to-be report struggling to find clear information, especially for these high-risk children. There's also perhaps a tendency among some medical professionals to understandably err on the side of caution. A safety first approach, which often means not actively encouraging early allergen introduction.
Amy:Hmm. A sort of cautious inertia.
Ivan:Perhaps. So this proposed review isn't just about writing new guidelines. It's aiming for more clarity, consistency, raising public awareness, and empowering healthcare professionals, too, with better education and training. Plus, it touches on a critical equity issue. How so? Evidence suggests that young children from some ethnic minority families are statistically more likely both to develop an allergy and to have multiple allergies. So for them, clear, up-to-date guidance is even more vital. They're potentially more disadvantaged by the current ambiguity.
Amy:So as we see this clear intention in Parliament to shift from, let's say, reactive treatment to proactive prevention in childhood allergies, it really raises a powerful question for you listening. If our approach to something as fundamental as infant nutrition can be so drastically re-evaluated based on new evidence, what other pieces of long-standing advice in public health might be As always,
Ivan:find us on social media at BenchReportUK.
Amy:Get in touch with any topic important to you. Remember, politics is everyone's business. Take care.
